為控制船舶大氣污染,改善環(huán)境空氣質(zhì)量,2015年中國首次設(shè)立了珠三角、長三角、環(huán)渤海(京津冀)水域船舶排放控制區(qū)。為滿足海洋環(huán)境保護委員會第70次會議中有關(guān)更嚴(yán)格的船舶排放控制的要求,中國擬于2030年設(shè)立經(jīng)國際海事組織審議通過的國際排放控制區(qū)。本文對現(xiàn)有的NOx及SOx減排技術(shù)進行探討,對中國設(shè)立國際排放控制區(qū)給其航運業(yè)帶來的減排成本進行分析�；�于文獻調(diào)研及數(shù)據(jù)分析,文章分別計算了使用低硫燃油、廢氣清洗系統(tǒng)(Exhaust Gas Cleaning Systems, EGCS)、選擇性催化還原技術(shù)(Selective Catalytic Reduction, SCR)、廢氣循環(huán)技術(shù)(Exhaust Gas Recirculation, EGR)四種傳統(tǒng)除氮除硫技術(shù)的減排成本。結(jié)果表明,使用低硫燃油為硫減排的最佳技術(shù)方案,安裝SCR為氮減排的最佳技術(shù)方案。除了傳統(tǒng)的減排技術(shù),本文還計算了使用岸電系統(tǒng)及LNG兩種綠色能源的減排成本。計算數(shù)據(jù)顯示,六種減排方案的減排成本分別為28.66億, 3.24億,10.71億, 4.02億, 2.32億和3.4億美元。 

【文章來源】：Journal of Resources and Ecology. 2020年04期 第388-393頁

【文章頁數(shù)】：6 頁

【文章目錄】：
1 Introduction
2 Brief comparison of emission reduction alternatives
    2.1 Switching to low-sulphur fuel
    2.2 Installing exhaust gas cleaning systems
    2.3 Installing selective catalytic reduction system
    2.4 Installing exhaust gas recirculation system
    2.5 Installing shore power application
    2.6 Liquefied natural gas ships
3 Cost estimates of emission reduction alternatives
    3.1 Cost of switching to low-sulphur fuel
    3.2 The cost of exhaust gas cleaning systems
    3.3 The cost of selective catalytic reduction systems
    3.4 The cost of exhaust gas recirculation systems
    3.5 The cost of installing shore power application
4 Results and discussion
    4.1 The cost of Sulphur Oxides abatement
        4.1.1 The cost of switching to low-sulphur fuel
        4.1.2 The cost of installing an exhaust gas recirculation system
    4.2 The cost of Nitrogen Oxide abatement
        4.2.1 The cost of installing selective catalytic reduction systems
        4.2.2 The cost of installing exhaust gas recirculation systems
    4.3 The cost for LNG vessels
    4.4 The cost for installing shore power facilities
5 Conclusions



本文編號：2898731